License: Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license (CC BY 3.0)
When quoting this document, please refer to the following
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2021.68
URN: urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-136071
Go to the corresponding LIPIcs Volume Portal

Komargodski, Ilan ; Shi, Elaine

Differentially Oblivious Turing Machines

LIPIcs-ITCS-2021-68.pdf (0.6 MB)


Oblivious RAM (ORAM) is a machinery that protects any RAM from leaking information about its secret input by observing only the access pattern. It is known that every ORAM must incur a logarithmic overhead compared to the non-oblivious RAM. In fact, even the seemingly weaker notion of differential obliviousness, which intuitively "protects" a single access by guaranteeing that the observed access pattern for every two "neighboring" logical access sequences satisfy (ε,δ)-differential privacy, is subject to a logarithmic lower bound.
In this work, we show that any Turing machine computation can be generically compiled into a differentially oblivious one with only doubly logarithmic overhead. More precisely, given a Turing machine that makes N transitions, the compiled Turing machine makes O(N ⋅ log log N) transitions in total and the physical head movements sequence satisfies (ε,δ)-differential privacy (for a constant ε and a negligible δ). We additionally show that Ω(log log N) overhead is necessary in a natural range of parameters (and in the balls and bins model).
As a corollary, we show that there exist natural data structures such as stack and queues (supporting online operations) on N elements for which there is a differentially oblivious implementation on a Turing machine incurring amortized O(log log N) overhead per operation, while it is known that any oblivious implementation must consume Ω(log N) operations unconditionally even on a RAM. Therefore, we obtain the first unconditional separation between obliviousness and differential obliviousness in the most natural setting of parameters where ε is a constant and δ is negligible. Before this work, such a separation was only known in the balls and bins model. Note that the lower bound applies in the RAM model while our upper bound is in the Turing machine model, making our separation stronger.

BibTeX - Entry

  author =	{Ilan Komargodski and Elaine Shi},
  title =	{{Differentially Oblivious Turing Machines}},
  booktitle =	{12th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2021)},
  pages =	{68:1--68:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-177-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2021},
  volume =	{185},
  editor =	{James R. Lee},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl--Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-136071},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2021.68},
  annote =	{Keywords: Differential privacy, Turing machines, obliviousness}

Keywords: Differential privacy, Turing machines, obliviousness
Collection: 12th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2021)
Issue Date: 2021
Date of publication: 04.02.2021

DROPS-Home | Fulltext Search | Imprint | Privacy Published by LZI